Dependence on portals
Visibility is rented month by month. The day you stop paying, the development disappears from the internet, and what you paid left nothing behind.
Almost every development in this region is sold through a borrowed channel. It works, until it does not: someone else communicates the price, someone else receives the enquiry, and the data does not exist. This page sets out that whole problem and how the alternative gets built.

A new build development in Alicante, Elche, the Vega Baja or Murcia reaches the market today through three doors: the property portals, the local agencies and the foreign resale networks. All three work and all three sell. None of the three is yours.
The result only shows at the end of the development. The units are sold, yes, but the developer ends up not knowing which channel sold them, without a buyer list of their own and without a single digital asset that serves the next scheme. It starts again from zero, and it pays again.
It is not one problem, it is six, and they feed each other. Almost no developer has all of them; almost none escapes three.
Visibility is rented month by month. The day you stop paying, the development disappears from the internet, and what you paid left nothing behind.
Foreign networks reselling the product with their own copy, their own photographs and their own commission. The buyer believes they are buying from them.
The interested party writes to a third party, who decides when, how and on what terms to pass it on. The relationship begins without the developer.
No list of your own, not by country, not by house type, not by budget. When the next development starts there is nobody to tell.
Nobody can answer where a sale came from. Next month spending is decided by instinct and by habit.
It is the consequence of the other five: the development has no home on the internet where the buyer arrives directly.
The visible cost is the commission, and it is the one everybody looks at. The invisible cost is dearer: it is the negotiating margin lost when a third party communicates the price, and it is the sales time burned on enquiries that arrive late and poorly qualified.
And there is a third cost that only appears on the next development. A developer with an owned channel starts the new scheme with a domain that already ranks, copy that already exists in five languages and a list of people who already left their email. A developer without one starts again on day one, and pays again for the same rented visibility.
We search for your development the way a buyer in Madrid, Manchester, Antwerp or Oslo would. Who advertises it, in what position, at what price and with which photographs. The output is a document with dated screenshots, not an opinion.
A domain in the developer name, a structure by house type, floor plans, specification, a contact route and real speed on a phone. It is the central asset: everything else points at it.
Five languages written per market, each on its own address, with correct hreflang and canonical so they compete in their country instead of competing with each other.
Ranking in the search engine of the buyer country, on the searches they actually make, which are not the ones a Spanish buyer makes about the same home.
Search and social segmented by country and intent, with the advertising account in the developer name and the media budget always separate from the fee.
Every enquiry tied to its origin: country, language, campaign, page. The monthly report gives the real cost per useful enquiry, not impressions.
We cannot show you client results: the brand is new and we are not going to invent any. What we can do is work the sum out in front of you, with the published sector averages and with our own assumptions labelled one by one.
The starting point of the sum. It is a neutral unit: what they cost to buy changes with the country, the season and the competition, which is why this site publishes no spend figure anywhere.
At a click through rate between 2.5 % and 3.75 %. The upper end is the published real estate average for lead campaigns on Meta; the lower end is the cautious assumption we apply when the audience is international and split across several languages.
Between 3 % and 9.5 % of those clicks leave their details. The upper end is again the published average, measured on forms inside the social network itself; the lower end is what we consider reasonable for a form hosted on the development site, which asks for more and filters more.
A coherent budget, a sensible purchase horizon and a real wish to see the development. There is no public figure worth quoting here: this is measured in your own dashboard from the first month, and it depends above all on how fast your sales team answers.
This is a sum, not a promise. We do not guarantee sales or a number of enquiries, and we publish no client results. We would rather show the method and let you judge the arithmetic.
It is why we insist on search even though it is slow, and why we do not sell campaigns alone. You need both, but they do not do the same job or on the same timescale.
Enquiries arriving each month
Alicante, Elche, the Vega Baja and Murcia are not one market with four names. They differ in product, in buyer and in season.
The city and its coastal strip, with the most even balance between resident and foreign buyer anywhere on the axis.
A market in its own right: national demand in the inland capital, international demand on the Mar Menor and the Costa Cálida.
The second city of the province and a mostly resident demand. A different buyer, a different pitch and a different calendar.
Orihuela, Torrevieja, Guardamar, Pilar de la Horadada, Rojales. The most internationalised market, and the most dependent on intermediaries.
Each piece can be read on its own, but they only work together: a website without languages reaches nobody abroad, and acquisition without measurement cannot be corrected.
What a developer needs that a generalist agency rarely understands: the cycle of a scheme, the off plan phase and the sales team.
The central asset. Why the development website is not the developer corporate site, and what goes inside it.
Multilingual structure, hreflang and international SEO, so you compete in the buyer home country and not only in Spain.
How enquiries come in, how each one is tied to its source and how you learn which channel paid for the keys.
Content, publishing and community management for the development: who answers the messages, in which tone and how fast.
Who buys, from where, in which language and at what point in the year they start looking.
It is the set of owned digital assets a developer uses to put their scheme in front of the buyer and receive the enquiry directly: the development website, its languages, its ranking, its campaigns and the measurement of origin. It differs from advertising because it does not switch off when you stop paying: what was built remains.
Yes, and that is what we recommend when there are doubts. The inventory and the diagnosis can be commissioned on their own: you see the work and you see the problem before committing to the rest.
No. They can be kept exactly as they are. What changes is that they stop being the only door, and that for the first time you can compare what each channel costs with what it brings.
The emphasis changes, not the method. With advanced works, per unit sheets and immediate acquisition matter more than building the brand of the scheme, and the site is built lighter and faster.
Yes. The scope is matched to the size: a twelve home development does not need five languages and five campaigns, and saying so is part of the job.
It is the least committing part and the one that changes the conversation most: seeing, in black and white, how your development is being sold today without you.